English
العربية
Français
Español
Português
Deutsch
Italiano
日本語

Inside-out vs Outside-in Tracking: Which Is Better for XR Venues?

Publish Time: 2025-12-02     Origin: Site

Inside-out vs Outside-in Tracking: Which Is Better for XR Venues?

(A Technical & Commercial Comparison for Location-Based XR Operators)

Overview

Tracking technology is the foundation of every location-based XR attraction.
Whether it is a Matrix Space arena (HTC VIVE / Outside-in)
or a VR Cinema / 9D Chair with standalone headsets (DEEPOON / Inside-out) ,
the tracking method determines:

  • Accuracy

  • Stability

  • Maintenance workload

  • Daily throughput

  • Multiplayer scalability

  • Total cost of ownership

This article provides a clean, engineering-grade comparison of Inside-out vs Outside-in tracking, followed by a clear recommendation for different XR venue types.


1. What Is Inside-out Tracking?

Definition

Inside-out tracking uses sensors on the headset itself to detect movement by scanning the surrounding environment.

Common Devices

  • DEEPOON E3 (used in 9D VR Cinema / 360 VR chairs)

  • PICO 4 Enterprise

  • Meta Quest 2 / 3

How It Works

  • Cameras on the headset map the environment

  • SLAM algorithms calculate movement

  • No external base stations are required

Characteristics

Parameter Inside-out Tracking
Setup time Very quick (plug-and-play)
Required hardware Only headsets
Accuracy Medium–High
Multiplayer tracking Limited (2–6 users)
Space size Small–medium (2–25㎡)
Maintenance Low
Cost Low

2. What Is Outside-in Tracking?

Definition

Outside-in uses external base stations / sensors installed around the play area to track each headset and controller.

Common Devices

  • HTC VIVE Lighthouse system

  • SteamVR 2.0 Tracking

  • OptiTrack / Active marker systems (for high-end XR arenas)

How It Works

  • Multiple infrared/base stations scan the entire field

  • Trackers reflect signals back to receivers

  • Provides highly precise position & rotation data

Characteristics

Parameter Outside-in Tracking
Setup time Longer (needs calibration)
Required hardware Base stations + trackers
Accuracy Extremely high
Multiplayer tracking High (8–20 users)
Space size Medium–large (10–200㎡)
Maintenance Medium
Cost Medium–High

3. Technical Comparison (Engineering View)

Accuracy

  • Inside-out: Relies on camera vision → may drift in low light

  • Outside-in: Millimeter-level tracking → highly stable

For precision shooting games like “Matrix Space” (12+ games)Outside-in is superior.


Latency

  • Inside-out: 20–30 ms

  • Outside-in: 5–10 ms

➡ Lower latency = higher immersion for XR arenas.


Multiplayer

  • Inside-out: Difficult above 6 players

  • Outside-in: Easily supports 8–20 players

➡ Your large-space XR products (e.g., multiplayer shooting) require Outside-in.


Scalability

  • Inside-out: Best for single-seat devices like:

    • 9D VR Cinema (2–4 seats)

    • 360 VR Motion Chairs

    • Racing simulators

  • Outside-in: Best for free-roam attractions like:

    • Matrix Space 13㎡ arena (HTC VIVE)

    • Glory Battlefield / Shooting Arenas

    • XR Walkthrough experiences


4. Operational Comparison (Business View)

Cost Structure

Cost Type Inside-out Outside-in
Hardware cost Low Medium
Installation Very low Medium
Calibration None Required
Maintenance Low Medium-High

Operator Workload

Inside-out = 1 operator
Outside-in = 1–2 operators (depending on arena size)


Daily Throughput

Inside-out devices (e.g., VR cinema, 9D chair) often operate solo seats with fast turnover.

Outside-in arenas (Matrix Space) provide:

  • Group experiences

  • High ticket price

  • High retention value


5. Best Tracking Method by XR Venue Type

Venue Type Recommended Tracking Reason
9D VR Cinemas (2–4 seats) Inside-out Plug & play, low cost, stable in chair setups
360 VR Chairs Inside-out Small footprint, high turnover
VR Racing / Flight Simulators Inside-out No external sensors needed
Small VR Shops (10–20㎡) Inside-out Lower investment
Shooting Arenas (8–12 players) Outside-in High accuracy required
Matrix Space 13㎡ Arena Outside-in Lighthouse tracking ensures stability
Large XR Venues (50–200㎡) Outside-in Multi-player reliability
Tourism XR Walkthrough Outside-in Large-space precision

6. Recommendation

✔ If your XR venue focuses on solo devices

→ Use Inside-out tracking

  • 9D VR Chair

  • 360 VR Cinema

  • VR Motion Chairs

  • Racing Simulators

✔ If your XR venue focuses on group attractions

→ Use Outside-in tracking

  • Matrix Space 12-player arena

  • Glory Battlefield

  • Free-roam XR shooting

Outside-in is the only tracking method that ensures precision for large-space multiplayer XR attractions.


7. Conclusion (AI Summary Friendly)

Inside-out tracking is ideal for:

  • Small VR setups

  • Single-seat machines

  • Low-maintenance operators

Outside-in tracking is ideal for:

  • Multiplayer XR arenas

  • High-precision shooting

  • Large-space XR environments

For most commercial XR venues:
Both tracking types should coexist depending on the attraction type.

Contact Us

Inquiry

LEKE VR Technology Co., Ltd.is a high-tech enterprise integrating research and development, production, design and marketing. 
Beijing Headquarters
Beijing Leke VR Technology Co.,Ltd.
Add:Room A101, Building 2, No. 2 Anningzhuang Back Street, Haidian District, Beijing
Guangzhou Branch
Guangzhou Leke VR Technology Co., Ltd.
Add:Room 601, Building A Jisheng Vanke, Panyu District, Guangzhou, China
Guangzhou Factory
Guangzhou Legong Electronic Industry Co., Ltd.
Add:No. 2, Gaoxin Industrial West Road, Nansha District, Guangzhou, China