Inside-out vs Outside-in Tracking: Which Is Better for XR Venues?

Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2025-12-02 Origin: Site

Inquire

Inside-out vs Outside-in Tracking: Which Is Better for XR Venues?

(A Technical & Commercial Comparison for Location-Based XR Operators)

Overview

Tracking technology is the foundation of every location-based XR attraction.
Whether it is a Matrix Space arena (HTC VIVE / Outside-in)
or a VR Cinema / 9D Chair with standalone headsets (DEEPOON / Inside-out) ,
the tracking method determines:

Accuracy
Stability
Maintenance workload
Daily throughput
Multiplayer scalability
Total cost of ownership

This article provides a clean, engineering-grade comparison of Inside-out vs Outside-in tracking, followed by a clear recommendation for different XR venue types.

1. What Is Inside-out Tracking?

Definition

Inside-out tracking uses sensors on the headset itself to detect movement by scanning the surrounding environment.

Common Devices

DEEPOON E3 (used in 9D VR Cinema / 360 VR chairs)
PICO 4 Enterprise
Meta Quest 2 / 3

How It Works

Cameras on the headset map the environment
SLAM algorithms calculate movement
No external base stations are required

Characteristics

Parameter	Inside-out Tracking
Setup time	Very quick (plug-and-play)
Required hardware	Only headsets
Accuracy	Medium–High
Multiplayer tracking	Limited (2–6 users)
Space size	Small–medium (2–25㎡)
Maintenance	Low
Cost	Low

2. What Is Outside-in Tracking?

Definition

Outside-in uses external base stations / sensors installed around the play area to track each headset and controller.

Common Devices

HTC VIVE Lighthouse system
SteamVR 2.0 Tracking
OptiTrack / Active marker systems (for high-end XR arenas)

How It Works

Multiple infrared/base stations scan the entire field
Trackers reflect signals back to receivers
Provides highly precise position & rotation data

Characteristics

Parameter	Outside-in Tracking
Setup time	Longer (needs calibration)
Required hardware	Base stations + trackers
Accuracy	Extremely high
Multiplayer tracking	High (8–20 users)
Space size	Medium–large (10–200㎡)
Maintenance	Medium
Cost	Medium–High

3. Technical Comparison (Engineering View)

Accuracy

Inside-out: Relies on camera vision → may drift in low light
Outside-in: Millimeter-level tracking → highly stable

➡ For precision shooting games like “Matrix Space” (12+ games) → Outside-in is superior.

Latency

Inside-out: 20–30 ms
Outside-in: 5–10 ms

➡ Lower latency = higher immersion for XR arenas.

Multiplayer

Inside-out: Difficult above 6 players
Outside-in: Easily supports 8–20 players

➡ Your large-space XR products (e.g., multiplayer shooting) require Outside-in.

Scalability

Inside-out: Best for single-seat devices like:

9D VR Cinema (2–4 seats)
360 VR Motion Chairs
Racing simulators

Outside-in: Best for free-roam attractions like:

Matrix Space 13㎡ arena (HTC VIVE)
Glory Battlefield / Shooting Arenas
XR Walkthrough experiences

4. Operational Comparison (Business View)

Cost Structure

Cost Type	Inside-out	Outside-in
Hardware cost	Low	Medium
Installation	Very low	Medium
Calibration	None	Required
Maintenance	Low	Medium-High

Operator Workload

Inside-out = 1 operator
Outside-in = 1–2 operators (depending on arena size)

⚡ Daily Throughput

Inside-out devices (e.g., VR cinema, 9D chair) often operate solo seats with fast turnover.

Outside-in arenas (Matrix Space) provide:

Group experiences
High ticket price
High retention value

5. Best Tracking Method by XR Venue Type

Venue Type	Recommended Tracking	Reason
9D VR Cinemas (2–4 seats)	Inside-out	Plug & play, low cost, stable in chair setups
360 VR Chairs	Inside-out	Small footprint, high turnover
VR Racing / Flight Simulators	Inside-out	No external sensors needed
Small VR Shops (10–20㎡)	Inside-out	Lower investment
Shooting Arenas (8–12 players)	Outside-in	High accuracy required
Matrix Space 13㎡ Arena	Outside-in	Lighthouse tracking ensures stability
Large XR Venues (50–200㎡)	Outside-in	Multi-player reliability
Tourism XR Walkthrough	Outside-in	Large-space precision